CESSNA 152 near Danbury, CT — 2023-04-10
- Date
- 2023-04-10
- Location
- Danbury, CT, USA
- Airport
- DXR
- Aircraft
- CESSNA 152
- Registration
- N757YM
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Minor
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Approach
Probable cause
The flight instructor’s inadequate preflight fuel planning and oversight of the preflight inspection, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
NTSB narrative
The airplane was fueled earlier in the day then flown on 3 separate flights totaling 3.1 hours. Before the accident flight, the student pilot used a fuel dipstick to check the fuel level in each tank but she did not recall the fuel quantity in either tank and the flight instructor did not verify the fuel quantity. After departure, with a reported 15 gallons of fuel on board, the student performed pattern work, airwork, and more traffic pattern work. After the 3rd go-around, while on the downwind leg abeam the landing spot, the flight instructor took over the controls to demonstrate a landing. After turning onto base leg, the engine began to lose power. He pitched then nose down and reported the engine started and for about 2 seconds before losing power completely. He noted there were 2 high towers near the end of the runway and turned toward a grass field behind him and performed a steep spiral to lose altitude. The airplane slowed, and he heard the stall warning horn. He moved the flap selector from 10° to 20° then braced for impact. The airplane impacted a shed and came to rest adjacent to a house. Postaccident examination of the engine and its systems revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. The airframe fuel strainer was found to contain about 1 ounce of fuel and the carburetor bowl was empty. The right wing contained about 1.7 gallons of fuel and the left fuel tank was empty. The usable fuel capacity of the airplane was 24.5 gallons. The airplane was flown 5.3 hours since the fuel tanks were last filled. The published fuel consumption rate for the engine was listed as being between 5.8 gallons per hour (gph) and 9.5 gph depending on power settings used. Given the fuel capacity of the airplane and the amount of time the airplane was flown after being fueled, it is likely that the loss of engine power was a result of fuel exhaustion.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Fuel management
- First missed decision gate
- Instructor should have verified fuel levels before flight.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Video
- ADS-B / radar
- Photos
- 15 docket documents
Docket documents15
- OPERATOR DISPATCH RECORDSatc
- MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD - ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIVE INFORMATIONform
- PILOT/OPERATOR AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT, NTSB FORM 6120.1form
- RELEASE OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE, NTSB FORM 6120.15form
- FAA INSPECTOR STATEMENTinterview
- AIRPLANE TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEETother
- EXCERPTS FROM ENGINE MANUFACTURER OPERATOR'S MANUALother
- EXCERPTS FROM MAINTENANCE RECORDSother
- EXCERPTS FROM PILOT'S OPERATING HANDBOOKother
- FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FOR ENGINE AND PROPELLER CHANGESother
- FUEL RECORDSother
- NTSB RECORD OF CONVERSATION WITH FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION INSPECTOR-IN-CHARGEother
- RECORD OF NTSB CONVERSATIONSother
- INVESTIGATIVE PHOTOGRAPHSphotos
- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE A�� BROADCAST (ADS-B) TABULAR DATAvideo
Related mishaps
- LOCKWOOD AIR CAM
2026-05-20 · Hutchinson, KS
- CESSNA 152
2026-03-03 · Thonotosassa, FL
- CESSNA T337G
2025-07-14 · Pembroke Pines, FL
- CESSNA 150
2025-07-11 · St. Augustine, FL
- CESSNA 177B
2025-05-31 · Columbus, MS
- BELL 206
2025-03-21 · Chamblee, GA