ARION LIGHTNING near Chuckey, TN — 2012-10-11
- Date
- 2012-10-11
- Location
- Chuckey, TN, USA
- Airport
- 04TN
- Aircraft
- ARION LIGHTNING
- Registration
- N290AL
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Serious
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Takeoff roll
Probable cause
The pilot’s inadequate preflight planning, which resulted in an attempted takeoff at a high gross weight, near the limit of its aft center of gravity, and with the airplane incorrectly configured with fully extended flaps. Contributing to the accident was the lack of a pretakeoff checklist and the pilot’s lack of total flight experience in make and model.
Contributing factors
Contributing to the accident was the lack of a pretakeoff checklist and the pilot's lack of total flight experience in make and model.
NTSB narrative
The experimental amateur-built airplane accelerated normally during the takeoff roll for the Phase 1 test flight before pitching up sharply and beginning a slow climb to about 50 to 60 feet above the ground. The wings rocked back and forth as it drifted off the left side of the runway. Witnesses reported that the airplane appeared out of control and off center. The airplane was heading toward trees and a residence when the pilot-rated passenger, who was on board to record information during the test flight, took control of the airplane, lowered the nose, and turned away from obstructions; however, the nose abruptly dropped and the airplane struck the ground. Postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any preimpact malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The flaps were found in the fully extended position and, given reports of the airplane's behavior after the takeoff, were likely fully extended during takeoff and at the time of impact. The owner/builder reported that the normal takeoff procedure called for a 10-degree flap setting and that the airplane did not have a pretakeoff checklist, which would be developed during the flight testing. An estimated weight and balance calculation for the accident flight placed the airplane about 30 pounds over its published maximum gross weight and about a 1/2 inch from its aft center of gravity limit; however, the maximum gross weight is about 75 pounds below the general specifications listed by the kit manufacturer. The owner and pilot-rated passenger stated that they did not discuss or perform weight and balance calculations before the accident flight. The airplane had been operated for about 15 hours since new and since its most recent condition inspection, which was performed about 1 month before the accident. The pilot's total flight experience in make and model consisted of about 3 hours with a flight instructor and about 4 hours of solo flight experience. Given the lack of a pretakeoff checklist and the pilot's minimal flight experience in the airplane make and model, it is likely that he began the takeoff with flaps fully extended, which combined with the airplane's high gross weight and near-limit aft center of gravity, resulted in the loss of airplane control.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Loss of control
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot could have aborted takeoff when the airplane 'did not feel right.'
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 22 docket documents
Docket documents22
- NTSB Party Gudiance and Formform
- Retention / Release of Wreckage Form and Evidence Control Formsform
- Affidavit of Ownership and Eligibility Statement for Amateur-Built Aircraftinterview
- FAA Inspector Statement and Interview Summaryinterview
- Airplane Special Airworthiness Certificateother
- Maintenance Records (excerpts)other
- Memorandums For Recordother
- Operating Limitationsother
- Weather Observationsother
- Weight and Balance Dataother
- Photograph # 1 – Overview of wreckagephotos
- Photograph # 10 – View of engine after nose gear portion was removedphotos
- Photograph # 11 – Close-up view of propellerphotos
- Photograph # 2 – Main wreckage as it came to rest (View of front portion of the airplane)photos
- Photograph # 3 – Main wreckage as it came to rest (View of left-rear portion of the airplane)photos
- Photograph # 4 – Main wreckage as it came to rest (View of rear portion of the airplane)photos
- Photograph # 5 – Main wreckage as it came to rest (View of right-front portion of the airplane)photos
- Photograph # 6 – Instrument panel (After removal of instruments by owner prior to NTSB arrival)photos
- Photograph # 7 – Cockpit Seats and controlsphotos
- Photograph # 8 – Flap actuator jackscrew measurementphotos
- Photograph # 9 – Engine as it came to rest with nose gear attachedphotos
- Electronic Devices 17 - Specialist's Factual Reportreport
Related mishaps
- CESSNA 170B
2026-07-10 · Hartwell, GA
- CASSUTT IIIM
2026-07-05 · Odessa, TX
- CESSNA 172H
2026-05-25 · Berryville, AR
- COMMANDER AIRCRAFT CO 114TC
2026-05-23 · Woodruff, WI
- BELL 206-L4
2026-05-23 · Cedar City, UT
- CESSNA 172S
2026-05-18 · Harrison, NY