LUSCOMBE 8 near Huntingburg, IN — 2016-10-12
- Date
- 2016-10-12
- Location
- Huntingburg, IN, USA
- Airport
- HNB
- Aircraft
- LUSCOMBE 8
- Registration
- N39083
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Minor
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Landing
Probable cause
The pilot’s delayed crosswind correction during the landing roll with a gusting left crosswind, which resulted in the airplane weathervaning and nosing over.
NTSB narrative
According to the pilot in the tailwheel-equipped airplane, after a 1-hour-long local flight, he returned to the departure airport and noticed that he would be landing with a gusting, direct left crosswind. He reported that he made one low pass about 20 ft above the ground and that he "felt the airplane was steady." He accomplished a go-around and initiated an approach. He recalled that he made a three-point landing and touched down about 50 mph on the runway centerline. When the wheels touched down, a wind gust lifted the left wing, and he tried to compensate with aileron and throttle, but he "was too slow to regain control of the airplane." He reported that the left wing struck the ground and that the airplane exited the left side of the runway and nosed over. The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and the firewall. The METAR at the airport reported that, at the time of the accident, the wind was from 180° at 11 knots, gusting to 16 knots. The airplane landed on runway 27. According to the FAA-H-8083-3B Airplane Flying Handbook, "Crosswind After-Landing Roll," pages 8-15 and 8-16: Retaining control on the ground is a critical part of the after-landing roll, because of the weathervaning effect of the wind on the airplane. While the airplane is decelerating during the after-landing roll, more and more aileron is applied to keep the upwind wing from rising. Since the airplane is slowing down, there is less airflow around the ailerons and they become less effective. At the same time, the relative wind is becoming more of a crosswind and exerting a greater lifting force on the upwind wing. When the airplane is coming to a stop, the aileron control must be held fully toward the wind. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Loss of control
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot could have opted for a different landing technique or go-around earlier.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 2 docket documents
Docket documents2
Related mishaps
- CESSNA A185F
2026-06-27 · Angel Fire, NM
- CESSNA 180H
2026-06-21 · Port Angeles, WA
- CESSNA 140
2026-06-01 · Pasco, WA
- EAA Acro Sport II
2026-05-31 · Sheridan, AR
- PITTS SPECIAL S-1S
2026-05-29 · Bartlesville, OK
- GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORP GVII-G600
2026-05-27 · Birmingham, AL