CESSNA U206F near Arcadia, FL — 2011-08-12
- Date
- 2011-08-12
- Location
- Arcadia, FL, USA
- Aircraft
- CESSNA U206F
- Registration
- N8737Q
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Minor
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Takeoff roll
Probable cause
The pilot’s decision to take off in high density altitude conditions with the airplane over its maximum gross weight, due to the pilot’s improper weight and balance calculations, which resulted in the airplane’s inability to climb or maintain altitude.
NTSB narrative
The pilot stated that during the water takeoff, he used 10 degrees of flaps to get the airplane on "plane." Once the airplane began to climb, he added another 10 degrees of flaps to climb. The airplane climbed to about 400 feet but would not maintain altitude. There was no loss in engine power, and the airplane began to descend. The pilot executed a forced landing into a field, and the airplane collided with trees. After recovery of the airplane, the engine was removed and test run. No preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures were found that would have precluded normal engine operation. A review of the performance chart revealed that the airplane, in a clean configuration and at a maximum gross weight of 3,800 pounds, should have been able to maintain a rate of climb of 600 feet per minute at about 65 knots. The density altitude at the time of the accident was about 2,300 feet. Although the pilot estimated the gross weight was 3,695 pounds, postaccident weight and balance calculations revealed the estimated weight of the airplane at takeoff was 3,855 pounds, which was 55 pounds above the maximum allowable gross weight. High density altitude and increased gross weight both adversely affect an airplane's climb performance. The presence of either or both conditions requires pilot vigilance to maintain adequate airspeed during takeoff and climb. Aircraft performance can become marginal in high density altitude conditions, and it may be necessary to reduce aircraft gross weight for safe operations. It is likely that the high density altitude combined with operation over the airplane’s maximum permitted takeoff gross weight resulted in the airplane's inability to climb or maintain altitude. These factors would both reduce the performance of the airplane.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Human factors
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot should have ensured proper weight and balance before takeoff.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 20 docket documents
Docket documents20
- Evidence Control Formform
- FAA Density Altitude Informationform
- Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1form
- Retention / Release of Wreckage Formform
- Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation-Continental Motorsinterview
- Aircraft STCother
- Corrected Weight and Balance Calculationsother
- Density Altitude Calculationother
- Engine logbook page excerptsother
- POH Floatplane Excerptsother
- Pilots Weight & Balance Calculationsother
- Record of conversation passenger -Moreheadother
- U206F Float Equipped Airplane Flight Manual/POHother
- Photo 1-courtesy of FAA- Right side view of airplane in treesphotos
- Photo 2-Courtesy of FAA-Front view of airplane in treesphotos
- Photo 3-Courtesy of FAA-Front view of airplane in trees propeller and enginephotos
- Photo 4-Courtesy of FAA-Tree trunk propeller strikephotos
- Photo 5-Courtesy of FAA-Front view of Cockpit and firewallphotos
- DeSoto County Sheriff's Office Reportreport
- N8737Q weight and balance reportreport
Related mishaps
- BALONY KUBICEK SPOL SRO BB100Z
2026-04-27 · Elk Grove, CA
- MESSERSCHMITT-BOLKOW-BLOHM BK 117
2025-04-25 · Hartford, IL
- CESSNA 172L
2024-09-17 · DeLand, FL
- CESSNA 182
2024-06-28 · Big Creek, ID · 1 fatality
- BEECH A36
2023-10-21 · Covelo, CA · 2 fatalities
- CIRRUS SR22
2023-10-12 · Martinsville, VA