PIPER PA-24 near Red Hill, VA — 2008-10-24
- Date
- 2008-10-24
- Location
- Red Hill, VA, USA
- Airport
- CHO
- Aircraft
- PIPER PA-24
- Registration
- N8820P
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Fatal
- Fatalities
- 2
- Phase of flight
- Descent
Probable cause
The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control due to an improper repair to the stabilator, which resulted in an in-flight failure of the stabilator. Contributing to the accident was the descent in turbulence, at airspeeds above the maximum structural cruise speed.
Contributing factors
Contributing to the accident was the descent in turbulence, at airspeeds above the maximum structural cruise speed.
NTSB narrative
The flight was being operated on an instrument flight rules flight plan. About 6 minutes prior to the accident, the flight was cleared to descend from its cruise altitude of 7,000 feet. About 2 minutes after the descent clearance was issued, the owner/pilot requested a diversion to a different airport, due to low visibility at the original destination. The request was approved, a heading change to 360 degrees was issued, and about 4 minutes later, the airplane departed controlled flight, and impacted terrain. A performance study revealed that after the airplane left its cruise altitude, it initially descended at a calibrated airspeed of approximately 178 mph. Once the pilot completed the diversion turn, the airspeed increased to values that ranged between 190 and 196 mph. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the two stabilators had deformed and separated prior to impact, and that one stabilator had been improperly repaired with incorrect fasteners. A review of the certification, service, and maintenance information indicated that the airplane's original maximum structural cruise speed of 180 mph was still applicable; the airplane was not to be operated above this speed except in smooth air. A weather analysis indicated moderate to severe turbulence in the vicinity of the flight track.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Loss of control
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot could have aborted the approach to CHO when visibility was at minimums.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- ATC audio
- ADS-B / radar
- Photos
- 36 docket documents
Docket documents36
- ATC Communications Excerpts Transcriptatc
- ATC Radar Data, Derived Engineering Units (Electronic File)atc
- ATC Radar Tracking Dataatc
- ATC Radar Tracking Data (Electronic File)atc
- Party Formform
- Interview Summary, Pilot's Acquaintanceinterview
- Interview Summary, Pilot's Flight Review Flight Instructorinterview
- Witness Interview - JSI Mechanicinterview
- Witness Interview - JSI Ownerinterview
- Witness Interview - JSI Owner and Mechanicinterview
- Airframe Log Entry - Stabilator Installationother
- Airspeed Calculationsother
- JSI Stabilator Invoiceother
- KCHO ILS Rwy 3 IAPother
- KOMH GPS Rwy 8 IAPother
- METARsother
- Removed Stabilator Serial Numbersother
- Unapproved Parts Notification - Webcoother
- Webco Stabilator Invoicesother
- Details of Left Stabilator Separation - 11 Photographsphotos
- Photo - Accident Site Overviewphotos
- Photo - Layout, Left Stabilatorphotos
- Photo - Layout, Right Stabilator and Tailconephotos
- Photo - Layout, Wing (Left View)photos
- Photo - Layout, Wing (Right View)photos
- Photo - Left Outboard Stabilator Segment, in situphotos
- Photo - Main Wreckagephotos
- Photo - Propeller Blades and Hubphotos
- Photo - Stabilator Jackscrewphotos
- Photo - Stabilator Stopsphotos
- Photo - Tree Strikes, Looking Back Along Flight Pathphotos
- Materials Laboratory 15 - Factual Report 08-129 stabilatorsreport
- Meteorology 5 - Factual Report of Group Chairmanreport
- PIC Toxicology Reportreport
- Wreckage Diagramwreckage
- Wreckage Releasewreckage