EUROCOPTER EC 130 B4 near Noblesville, IN — 2011-11-03
- Date
- 2011-11-03
- Location
- Noblesville, IN, USA
- Aircraft
- EUROCOPTER EC 130 B4
- Registration
- N130AL
- Category
- Helicopter
- Highest injury
- Minor
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Approach
Probable cause
The hard landing the pilot performed with a quartering tailwind, leading to the helicopter's rollover. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s reliance on a weather service that did not provide a primary weather product.
Contributing factors
Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s reliance on a weather service that did not provide a primary weather product.
NTSB narrative
The pilot reported that before departure, he checked two internet weather services for his flight’s weather briefing. The weather forecast indicated visual meteorological conditions for the entire flight. The internet weather service used by the pilot contained a disclaimer stating the service “is not a substitute for an official flight briefing.” The weather was reportedly good until 10 miles north of the destination, where the flight encountered rain and low ceilings. The onboard radar indicated that weather had deteriorated behind the route of flight and along the proposed route of flight. Weather conditions continued to deteriorate and the pilot elected to perform a precautionary landing with a quartering tailwind. About 30 feet above the ground, the helicopter settled rapidly. The pilot added power to slow the descent and the helicopter made a firm landing with about 10 knots of forward speed. The right skid then dug into the soft field and the helicopter rolled onto its right side. A ground fire subsequently ensued. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions with the helicopter during the flight. The helicopter’s Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) stated that the primary source of preflight weather briefings is an individual briefing obtained from a briefer. Other sources include the internet-accessed Direct User Access Terminal System. The AIM advises that weather services provided by entities other than Federal Aviation Administration, National Weather Service (NWS), or their contractors may not meet quality control standards; the internet sites the pilot referenced were not supported by these entities. The AIM also indicated all "flight-related, aviation weather decisions must be based on primary weather products" that meet regulatory requirements. Prior to departure the NWS was reporting instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) in the destination area and an AIRMET for IMC was current for the route of flight that extended over the accident site.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- VFR into IMC
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot should have obtained an official weather briefing before departure.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- FDR / data
- 10 docket documents
Docket documents10
- Miscellaneous - Aeronautical Information Manual, Chapter 7 Safety of Flight Excerptform
- Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1form
- Retention / Release of Wreckage Formform
- Miscellaneous - Communication Summaryother
- Miscellaneous - Eurocopter Service Letter 1673-67-04other
- Miscellaneous - FAA Record of Telconother
- Miscellaneous - FAA Supplied Weather Dataother
- Miscellaneous - Garmin Brochureother
- Miscellaneous - NavMonster Website with Disclaimer "NavMonster is not a substitute for an official flight briefing"other
- NVM 17 - Specialist's Factual Reportreport
Related mishaps
- KODIAK AIRCRAFT CO INC KODIAK 100
2026-07-05 · New York, NY
- CESSNA 172
2026-05-27 · Naubinway, MI
- CESSNA 172S
2026-05-24 · Georgetown, TX
- GUENTHER GLEN A SEAREY LSX
2026-05-24 · Briarcliff, TX
- CESSNA 182Q
2026-04-12 · Lutz, FL
- FLIGHT DESIGN GMBH CTSW
2026-04-07 · Seguin, TX