Pilot Debrief

GRUMMAN G164 - A near Caruthers, CA — 2014-02-28

Final reportWPR14LA130
Sign in to save
Date
2014-02-28
Location
Caruthers, CA, USA
Aircraft
GRUMMAN G164 - A
Registration
N72ES
Category
Airplane
Highest injury
None
Fatalities
0
Phase of flight
Landing

Probable cause

An undetected fatigue crack in the landing gear leg, which initiated at an electrical arc-induced damage site of undetermined origin and resulted in landing gear failure. Contributing to the severity of damage to the airplane was the close proximity of an embankment to the runway.

NTSB narrative

The pilot completed his third aerial application sortie of the day in the airplane, and was returning for landing on the paved private airstrip. On touchdown, the pilot heard a "huge bang," and the airplane began to roll right wing down. The pilot tried to correct with aileron, but as the airplane slowed, its right wing contacted the ground. The airplane veered to the right, departed the paved surface, and struck an embankment that bordered the runway, which caused the airplane to nose over. The airplane came to rest inverted, partially down the embankment. Examination of the airplane revealed that the right main landing gear leg had fractured and separated near the upper bend just below the fuselage. Laboratory analysis revealed that the leg failure was the result of a fatigue crack that went undetected until the remaining material was insufficiently strong to sustain the landing load. The fatigue crack originated at the site of electrical arc damage to the gear leg. Possible mechanisms for the arc damage included a power line strike, a lightning strike, improper grounding during weld repairs to the airframe, or processing damage during overhaul of the landing gear. Because the gear leg was heat-treated, the airplane manufacturer prohibited welding of the leg. The presence and condition of paint on the gear leg's surface at the site of the arc damage indicated that the damage occurred before the paint was applied and that the gear leg had not been painted in the recent past. Finding paint covering the damage raises questions about what inspections were performed on the gear leg and the efficacy of the inspections; however, because the maintenance records were not available, the history of the gear leg could not be determined.

Analysis

Primary failure mode
Mechanical failure
First missed decision gate
Inspection of landing gear leg could have identified fatigue before failure.

NTSB coding

Evidence available

  • 5 docket documents
View NTSB final reportView NTSB docket

Docket documents5

Related mishaps