BEECH D95 near Jacksonville, FL — 2015-04-23
- Date
- 2015-04-23
- Location
- Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Airport
- CRG
- Aircraft
- BEECH D95
- Registration
- N8950U
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- None
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Approach
Probable cause
The pilot's failure to properly configure the airplane for landing. Contributing to the accident were pilot fatigue, distraction, and complacency and the failure of the landing gear warning horn to sound for reasons that could not be determined based on the available information.
NTSB narrative
The private pilot/owner reported that an air traffic controller vectored the airplane for the final approach for landing after the cross-country flight. The pilot noted that he performed the Before Landing checklist by rote and inadvertently positioned the flap handle believing that it was the landing gear handle. He added that he heard an electric motor actuate and that the airplane's speed and handling responded in a familiar fashion, so he continued the landing approach. The airplane subsequently landed with the landing gear retracted, which resulted in substantial damage to the airplane. The pilot reported that he did not confirm that the three green landing gear lights on the instrument panel had illuminated before landing but that the landing gear warning horn did not sound. The pilot also reported that there were no mechanical anomalies with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. After recovery, the airplane was placed on jacks, and the landing gear was extended and retracted with no anomalies noted. The airplane was then configured for landing, and the throttles were reduced to the idle-power position. Once configured, the landing gear warning horn did not sound as prescribed. Troubleshooting of the gear warning horn could not be performed; therefore, the cause of the horn malfunction could not be determined. The pilot reported that he experienced lengthy delays earlier in his trip, which lengthened his duty day and resulted in fatigue. The pilot stated that fatigue, distractions, and complacency could have been mitigated by a "strict adherence to the checklist and visual verification of gear status."
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Human factors
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot did not confirm landing gear status before landing.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 5 docket documents
Docket documents5
Related mishaps
- PIPER PA-34-220T
2026-05-13 · Corpus Christi, TX
- PORTO Risen SV
2025-12-13 · Carson City, NV
- BEECH 95
2025-11-14 · Edgewater, FL
- BEECH D95A
2025-11-12 · Jasper, AL
- CESSNA R182
2025-11-05 · Brainerd, MN
- BEECH A36
2025-10-22 · Hondo, TX