BEECH 35 near Cedarcreek, MO — 2025-07-13
- Date
- 2025-07-13
- Location
- Cedarcreek, MO, USA
- Aircraft
- BEECH 35
- Registration
- N3181V
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Serious
- Fatalities
- 0
Probable cause
The student pilot’s failure to attain a proper airspeed and climb attitude during takeoff, which led to the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and experiencing an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident were the student pilot’s lack of experience and poor judgement.
Contributing factors
Contributing to the accident were the student pilot’s lack of experience and poor judgement.
NTSB narrative
During a personal flight, the student pilot, with a passenger, attempted a takeoff from a private grass airstrip that was 2,000 ft in length. The runway had an upward slope during its initial 1,000 ft with the steepest slope occurring during its initial 700 ft. A witness stated that the engine sounded normal and the airplane’s acceleration was slow during the uphill takeoff roll. The airplane lifted off about 900 ft down the runway and entered a nose-high attitude followed by what appeared to be an aerodynamic stall. The airplane descended, impacted terrain, and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. The pilot stated that the accident could have been prevented by extending the wing flaps after considering a change in density altitude. The Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C), Chapter 6, stated that the use of wing flaps is predicated on whether a takeoff is from a short/soft field. Two of the student pilot’s flight instructors stated that they advised the student pilot not to use the accident airplane to learn how to fly. Both flight instructors used a Piper PA-28-140, in preparation for the student pilot to fly solo. One of the flight instructors said that a Piper PA-28-140 was more appropriate to learn in, and the student pilot tended to aggressively get the airplane airborne during takeoff. There were no pilot logbook(s) that were provided showing that the student pilot had current student pilot endorsement(s) to fly the accident airplane and to fly to/from the airstrip. The pilot stated there was no mechanical malfunction failure of the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 7 docket documents
Docket documents7
- PILOT/OPERATOR AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT, NTSB FORM 6120.1form
- WITNESS STATEMENTSinterview
- EMAIL FROM STUDENT PILOT REGARDING STUDENT PILOT ENDORSEMENTSother
- MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD A�� RECORD OF CONVERSATION WITH FAA INSPECTORother
- MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD A�� RECORD OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM FAA INSPECTORother
- PILOT LOGBOOK EXCERPTSother
- PHOTOSphotos
Related mishaps
- BEECH B35
2026-01-02 · La Casa, TX
- CESSNA 172
2025-12-07 · Pensacola, FL
- CHAMPION 7ECA
2025-10-07 · East Rockingham, NC
- BEECH C23
2025-09-10 · South Bend, IN
- SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORP G-164B
2025-09-09 · Dover, DE
- Kyle Koncak Aventura II
2025-07-03 · DeLand, FL