ROTORSPORT UK LTD MTOsport 2017 near Springfield, TN — 2020-08-11
- Date
- 2020-08-11
- Location
- Springfield, TN, USA
- Airport
- M91
- Aircraft
- ROTORSPORT UK LTD MTOsport 2017
- Registration
- N615MW
- Category
- Gyroplane
- Highest injury
- None
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Takeoff roll
Probable cause
The pilot’s decision to continue the takeoff when the gyroplane’s actual performance failed to match that predicted in his performance planning. Contributing to the accident was the gyrocopter’s insufficient performance for reasons that could not be determined.
NTSB narrative
The pilot conducted an intersection takeoff with the gyroplane loaded near its maximum gross weight. The pilot stated he lifted off at 45 knots and accelerated "in ground effect" in an attempt to reach his planned climb speed of 55 knots, but the gyroplane would not accelerate past 48 knots. Data from an onboard GPS navigation device revealed that, in calm winds, the gyroplane reached a maximum groundspeed of 40 knots. Although the gyrocopter was only about 10 ft above the ground (agl) where, based on the pilot’s performance planning, it should have been 50 ft agl, and sufficient runway and turf overrun were available to abort the takeoff, the pilot chose to continue the takeoff. As the gyroplane approached the airport boundary, it was neither climbing nor accelerating. Due to obstacles beyond the airport’s boundary, the pilot performed a forced landing between the airport boundary fence and the road. The gyroplane landed hard and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. Despite the pilot having completed detailed weight and balance and performance-planning calculations, the pilot continued the takeoff when the gyroplane failed to achieve its predicted performance by large margins. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the gyroplane that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the wreckage and a postaccident engine run revealed no anomalies with the gyrocopter. The reason the gyrocopter did not perform as expected could not be determined based on available evidence.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Human factors
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot should have aborted takeoff when unable to reach planned climb speed.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Video
- FDR / data
- Photos
- 12 docket documents
Docket documents12
- PILOT/OPERATOR AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT, NTSB FORM 6120.1form
- RELEASE OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE, NTSB FORM 6120.15form
- FAA INTERVIEW SUMMARYinterview
- MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD A�� TELEPHONE INTERVIEW, PILOTinterview
- PILOT'S STATEMENT WITH CHARTS AND DIAGRAMSinterview
- MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD - FAA INSPECTOR - FUNCTIONAL CHECK OF ENGINEother
- PHOTO ARRAYphotos
- GPS FACTUAL REPORTreport
- NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DATAreport
- VIDEO FILEvideo
- VIDEO FILE - FUNCTIONAL TEST OF ENGINEvideo
- VIDEO FILE 12video
Related mishaps
- CIRRUS DESIGN CORP SF50
2024-11-27 · Mesa, AZ
- PIPER PA-34-220T
2024-08-05 · Minden, NV
- CESSNA 172S
2022-06-09 · Salina, KS
- Lake LA4
2020-04-04 · Hickory, NC
- Cessna 210 5(205)
2019-07-19 · Dallesport, OR
- CESSNA 182
2018-04-29 · Page, AZ