PIPER PA-28R-200 near Watertown, WI — 2011-10-17
- Date
- 2011-10-17
- Location
- Watertown, WI, USA
- Airport
- RYV
- Aircraft
- PIPER PA-28R-200
- Registration
- N300KR
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- None
- Fatalities
- 0
- Phase of flight
- Climb
Probable cause
The separation of the number 2 connecting rod from the crankshaft for reasons that could not be determined during postaccident metallurgical examination, which ultimately resulted in a total loss of engine power.
NTSB narrative
The pilots were about 5 miles from the destination airport when they heard a "loud bang" and engine oil immediately covered the front windshield. The engine continued to produce partial power until the airplane was in the airport traffic pattern, and then it lost total power. Due to a complete lack of forward visibility and another airplane in the runway run-up area, the flight instructor elected to make a forced landing on a roadway bordering the east side of the airport. The airplane struck a car and a pole before coming to a stop. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the number 2 connecting rod had separated from the crankshaft. The connecting rod failed about mid-length, with the upper portion remaining attached to the piston. The lower portion of the connecting rod was not recovered. The upper portion of the connecting rod and a recovered section of the rod cap both failed as a result of overstress bending. Neither component appeared discolored, which suggests there was an adequate engine oil supply before the failure. The number 1 and 3 connecting rods remained attached to the crankshaft; the number 4 connecting rod had separated from the crankshaft. The number 1, 3, and 4 connecting rods were discolored, consistent with continued operation with an insufficient supply of engine oil. Deformation of the lower end of the number 4 connecting rod was consistent with secondary mechanical damage; however, the rod appeared otherwise undeformed. A lack of evidence of oil starvation and the preponderance of crankcase damage in the area of the number 2 cylinder suggests that the engine failure was initiated by the separation of the number 2 connecting rod from the crankshaft. Metallurgical examination of the number 2 cylinder assembly and related components did not identify the initiating cause of this connecting rod separation. The total loss of engine power occurred upon separation of the number 4 connecting rod, which was precipitated by the prior loss of engine oil and secondary to the initial failure.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Engine power loss
- First missed decision gate
- Pilot could have returned to the airport after hearing the loud bang.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- Photos
- 16 docket documents
Docket documents16
- Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1form
- Private Pilot Statementinterview
- Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigationinterview
- Airplane Maintenance Detailother
- Airplane Maintenance Logsother
- Airplane Weight & Balanceother
- Airworthiness Directive Compliance Logother
- Engine Maintenance Logsother
- Propeller Maintenance Logsother
- Materials Laboratory 15 - Factual Report 12-069 (w 5 images)photos
- Photo 1 -- Engine Cowling/Propeller Assemblyphotos
- Photo 2 -- Right Wingphotos
- Photo 3 -- Engine Crankcasephotos
- Photo 4 -- Engine with Number 2 Cylinder Removedphotos
- Photo 5 -- Engine with Number 4 Cylinder Removedphotos
- Photo 6 -- Number 2 Engine Cylinderphotos
Related mishaps
- DIAMOND AIRCRAFT IND INC DA 40 NG
2023-12-15 · Asheville, NC
- TEXTRON AVIATION INC 172S
2023-11-09 · Erie, CO
- Mooney M20J
2020-05-13 · Phoenix, AZ
- Cessna 205
2018-10-04 · Wagoner, OK
- STINSON L 5
2018-06-14 · Thomson, GA
- SOCATA TB200
2017-11-10 · Annapolis, MD