Upton Bakeng Duce near Ramona, CA — 2009-05-09
- Date
- 2009-05-09
- Location
- Ramona, CA, USA
- Airport
- RNM
- Aircraft
- Upton Bakeng Duce
- Registration
- N86YP
- Category
- Airplane
- Highest injury
- Fatal
- Fatalities
- 2
- Phase of flight
- Maneuvering
Probable cause
An in-flight separation of the right wing, which resulted from the pilot's performance of a maneuver that produced aerodynamic loads that exceeded the wing spar’s degraded strength. The wing spar strength degradation was due to the builder's failure to comply with Federal Aviation Administration recommended guidelines to select and incorporate wood in the spar with a grain pattern aligned with the longitudinal axis of the spar.
NTSB narrative
The pilot and pilot-rated passenger departed for a personal flight in the borrowed experimental amateur-built airplane, which was equipped with dual flight controls. No determination could be made regarding which occupant was handling the controls during the flight. Recorded radar data indicated that 11 minutes into the flight, a series of maneuvers were performed. A witness stated that he observed the accident airplane spiral downward until it impacted the ground. He also reported observing a wing, which was separated from the main body of the airplane, fall to the ground nearby. Right wing spar fragments and the right aileron were found between 0.1 and 0.3 mile from the main wreckage, indicating that the right wing had separated in flight. Postaccident examination of fragments from the right wing’s broken wood wing spar revealed that the spar had been constructed with a wood grain orientation 12 degrees from the spar's longitudinal axis. This angle was inconsistent with published Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance stating that grain deviation from the longitudinal axis of the spar should be no more than 3.8 degrees. The maximum grain deviation is limited because the relative strength and stiffness of an airplane’s wood wing spar is reduced when the grain structure within the spar is not oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the spar. With a 12-degree grain orientation, the spar’s load-carrying capability was compromised and reduced to between 30 to 70 percent of that of a spar with a 0-degree (parallel) grain orientation. It is likely that the wing spar failed when the pilot performed a maneuver that produced aerodynamic loads exceeding its degraded strength.
Analysis
- Primary failure mode
- Loss of control
- First missed decision gate
- Pilots could have avoided dangerous maneuvers near each other before collision.
NTSB coding
Evidence available
- ATC audio
- ADS-B / radar
- Photos
- 36 docket documents
Docket documents36
- ATC 3 - SCT Radar Studyatc
- ATC Transcript, by SERCOatc
- Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1form
- Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15form
- Statement by FAA re Spar Dry Rotinterview
- Statement of Witnesses, NTSB Record of Conversationinterview
- Statement_of_witness_Ball,_NTSB_movieinterview
- Statements of Witnesses, by FAAinterview
- Accident Site & Witness Locationother
- Email re Aircraft Modifications and Equipmentother
- Operating Limitationsother
- Record of Conversation - San Diego County Sheriff Deptother
- Photo 1. Aileron, right wing. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 10. Fuselage, left side. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 11. Fuselage, right side. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 12. Left wing lift strut. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 13. Left wing tip. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 14. Main wreckage, bottom. Photo by FAAphotos
- Photo 15. Main wreckage, left wing in foreground. Photo by FAAphotos
- Photo 16. Right wing & lift strut. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 17. Right wing & spar. Photo by NTSB.photos
- Photo 18. Right wing, lift strut & broken spar. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 19. Right wing. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 2. Aileron, right, in field. Photo by FAAphotos
- Photo 20. Propeller. Photo by NTSBphotos
- Photo 3. Airplane, left side. Photo by Taylorphotos
- Photo 4. Airplane, right side. Photo by Taylorphotos
- Photo 5. Cockpit, front. Photo by Taylorphotos
- Photo 6. Cockpit, rear seat. Photo by Taylor.photos
- Photo 7. Empennage, bottom. Photo by FAAphotos
- Photo 8. Empennage, left side. Photo by Taylorphotos
- Photo 9. Empennage, top. Photo by FAAphotos
- Statement of witness, Ball, with NTSB Photosphotos
- Materials Laboratory Factual Report 10-019, Pieces of the right wingreport
- Toxicological Reports, Claerboutreport
- Toxicological Reports, Klomanreport
Related mishaps
- ALISPORT SRL SILENT 2 ELECTRO
2023-07-22 · Wallis, TX
- TEXTRON AVIATION INC 208B
2022-11-18 · Snohomish, WA · 4 fatalities
- AIRBORNE WINDSPORTS Edge XT-912L
2022-11-05 · Mokuleia, HI · 2 fatalities
- SEAMAX AIRCRAFT M-22
2022-10-06 · East Hampton, NY · 1 fatality
- MOYNIHAN RICHARD D VANS RV-7A
2022-02-19 · White Hills, AZ · 1 fatality
- CESSNA 172
2021-08-07 · Athol, ID